Barney Frank Links Online Gambling and the American Way

Spencer Bachus, a leading voice in Congress against gaming bills, said the Frank bill would provide "gambling in every home, every computer, Blackberry, iPod." He said states should be making the decisions to allow Internet gaming, rather than have it forced on them.
"This bill, if it imposes anything, imposes freedom," replied Republican John Campbell of California to the concerns of Bachus. Campbell noted that US residents would have increased choice, not diminished, if the bill were made law.
Bachus continued, saying the effect of the proposal would be redistribution of wealth from poor Americans to foreign gaming operators. He tried to use the insurgent grassroots rejection of governmental expansion and the socialistic redistribution of wealth to an ill-fitting connection with online casinos.
But Frank responded testily, calling Bachus' argument nonsense and saying to him that the bill is about "allowing people to voluntarily make decisions of which you disapprove." Frank said US residents should be free to make their own choice, without clearance from church groups "or the Christian Science Monitor or whoever."
When a committee member suggested the bill be tied to Jim McDermott's proposal on online gambling revenue or another such bill detailing tax collection, Frank went so far as to note that, while the revenues make a nice addition to the cause, he sees his measure as "a fundamental matter of freedom."
The bill passed a preliminary voice vote, with an official roll call of members to occur later today.
Recent Comments
Posted by: Online Gambling | When: 10/19/2010 08:13:21 PM EST |
I agree with Hon. Frank. Americans must not be refused of their freedom of choice. It's truly personal unless the government is paid by rich land casino owners to prevent online gambling. @_@ |
Posted by: JoeAdams | When: 11/01/2010 08:25:07 PM EST |
Online casino issue in the US is really getting complicated and getting its way to legalization seems to be going nowhere. |