RSS: Casino News Feeds

Playtech Online Casinos Caught in Payout Controversy

Clauses in casinos operating on Playtech software put sharp limits in maximum payouts for winners regardless of the size of the jackpot.

Play Now at Slots Oasis! The news that a winning patron at Joyland Online Casino had to haggle to receive a little over half the promised progressive jackpot he hit has spread to an examination of paying policies at casinos powered by Playtech. Clauses in casinos operating on Playtech software put sharp limits in maximum payouts for winners regardless of the size of the jackpot.

The player at Joyland reportedly won over $4 million at the Beach Life online slot, hitting the progressive jackpot. The patron was then informed the maximum the casino would pay a customer is $9000 a month, which would mean it would take thirty-nine years to settle his account.

Negotiations led to an unhappy player feeling forced into a take-it-or-leave-it deal, getting a little over half ($2.3 million) as a lump-sum settlement. Joyland was sold to William Hill, but questions remained regarding Playtech's position, and the disposition of the other $2 million.

But industry insiders have uncovered much of the corruption going on at these Internet casinos. According to information posted on the Casinomeister forums, Joyland's previous owner was a company called Six Digits Trading. This company is owned by Teddy Sagi, who owns almost half of Playtech.

Further, Playtech casinos have a similar clause in all agreements, limiting the maximum payout for any one account. While many online casinos employ such language, it is not considered industry policy to enforce this against progressive wins, lest progressive players shy away from online games.

The player's brother recounts on the forums how the casino attempted to force her to play out her winnings, giving them the chance to take half of her jackpot.

"He then called us back to inform us that he could give her large sums if and only if, Sylvia would lose it first and only then could he payout.  So in reality once she had played and lost , he would be able to pay, but that also changed when he noticed she wasn't playing anymore and the account was stable at $2 285 000.00 he changed this to them anticipating the payout by making withdrawals," says poster HankP.

Gaming industry representatives await either transparency from Playtech, along with a lengthy explanation, or their chance to return the karma to the online casino software supplier by guiding casino patrons elsewhere.

Published on May 15, 2009 by A.J.Maldonado

Help Spread the News

Email This Article to a Friend Digg this Article Bookmark this Article with Delicious Send this Article to Reddit Share this Article on Facebook Send this Article to Newsvine

Read Related Online Casino News Articles
Bob Barr Calls for Legalized Online Gambling
Gaming Analyst Blasts "Facts" in Hills Online Gambling Interview
White House Poll Shows US Citizens Want Online Casinos, Pot
Frank Online Gambling Bill Just First Step, Says iMEGA Head
Dutch Online Casino Ban Draws EC Anger

Post A Comment

*Your Name:
*Your Email:
*Character Verification:Random Letters and Numbers
 
*Comments: